Sacralising fandom? From the ‘loss hypothesis’ to fans’ media rituals
Keywords:
fandom, religion, experience, durkheimAbstract
Parallels and connections between media fandom and religion have continued to fascinatetheorists, with recent work equating the two phenomena in a variety of ways (e.g. Mills 2013; Wilson 2013). This piece argues that the ‘fandom = religion’ formulation tends to hinge on arange of discursive constructs, both of the “fan experience” (since empirical audience study israrely drawn on here), and of “contemporary society” assumed to be dis-enchanted, secularizedand/or marked by “liquid modernity”. As a result, what I term the “loss hypothesis” tends toframe ‘fandom = religion’ via functionalist concepts of religion, whereby traditional religiosity,and a secularized loss of faith, are displaced and replaced by media fandoms. Arguing againstthis discursive construct, I suggest that one way out of functionalist narratives may be to focus on fans’ sacralising media rituals, drawing on the work of Nick Couldry (2002). However, whereas Couldry proceeds via an analogy with Durkheim’s approach to the sacred/profane boundary, I argue instead that fan communities can contest and defer the border between ‘media world’ and ‘ordinary world’, making their versions of the sacred/profane binary rather more fractal, plural and mobile than a classical sociology of religion or a neo-Durkheimian position might imply.
References
Bauman, Zygmunt. Liquid Modernity, Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2000.
Beattie, Melissa. ‘The “Doctor Who Experience” (2012—) and the Commodification of Cardiff Bay’ in Matt Hills (ed) New Dimensions of Doctor Who, London and New York: I.B. Tauris, 2013: pp. 177-91.
Beaudoin, Tom. Witness to Dispossession: The Vocation of a Post-modern Theologian, New York Orbis Books, Maryknoll, 2008.
-- ‘The Ethics of Research in Faith and Culture: Scholarship as Fandom?’ in Christopher Deacy and Elisabeth Arweck (eds) Exploring Religion and the Sacred in a Media Age, Farnham: Ashgate, 2009: pp. 23—41.
Couldry, Nick. Media Rituals: A Critical Approach, London and New York: Routledge, 2003.
-- ‘Media Rituals: From Durkheim on Religion to Jade Goody on Religious Toleration’ in Christopher Deacy and Elisabeth Arweck (eds) Exploring Religion and the Sacred in a Media Age, Farnham: Ashgate, 2009: pp. 43—54.
Diffrient, David Scott. ‘The Cult Imaginary: Fringe Religions and Fan Cultures on American Television’ in Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2010: pp. 463–485.
During, Simon. Modern Enchantments: The Cultural Power of Secular Magic, Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 2002.
Edwards, Emily D. Metaphysical Media: The Occult Experience in Popular Culture, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2005.
Forde, Teresa. ‘“You Anorak”: The Doctor Who Experience and Experiencing Doctor Who’ in Paul Booth (ed) Fan Phenomena: Doctor Who, Bristol: Intellect, 2013: pp. 62—71.
Gilroy-Sinclair, Michael M. Blue Box Messiah, Kindle ebook, 2013.
Hill, Annette. Paranormal Media: Audiences, Spirits and Magic in Popular Culture, London and New York: Routledge, 2011.
Hills, Matt. Fan Cultures, London and New York: Routledge, 2002.
Lavery, David. ‘Gnosticism and the cult film’ in J.P. Telotte (ed) The Cult Film Experience, Austin: University of Texas Press, 1991: pp. 187—99.
Mathijs, Ernest and Sexton, Jamie. Cult Cinema: An Introduction, Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
Mills, Anthony R. ‘Buffyverse Fandom as Religion’ in Jennifer K. Stuller (ed) Fan Phenomena: Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Bristol: Intellect, 2013: pp. 134—143.
Smith, Justin. Withnail and Us: Cult Films and Film Cults in British Cinema, London and New York: I.B. Tauris, 2010.
Wilson, Elizabeth. Cultural Passions: Fans, Aesthetes and Tarot Readers, London and New York: I.B. Tauris, 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.